Example Codes and Miniapps
This page provides a brief overview of MFEM's example codes and miniapps. For
detailed documentation of the MFEM sources, including the examples, see the
online Doxygen documentation,
or the doc
directory in the distribution.
The goal of the example codes is to provide a stepbystep introduction to MFEM in simple model settings. The miniapps are more complex, and are intended to be more representative of the advanced usage of the library in physics/application codes. We recommend that new users start with the example codes before moving to the miniapps.
Select from the categories below to display examples and miniapps that contain the respective feature. All examples support (arbitrarily) highorder meshes and finite element spaces. The numerical results from the example codes can be visualized using the GLVis visualization tool (based on MFEM). See the GLVis website for more details.
Users are encouraged to submit any example codes and miniapps that they have created and
would like to share.
Contact a member of the MFEM team to report
bugs
or post questions or comments.
Application (PDE)
Finite Elements
Discretization
Solver
Example 0: Simplest Laplace Problem
This is the simplest MFEM example and a good starting point for new users. The example demonstrates the use of MFEM to define and solve an $H^1$ finite element discretization of the Laplace problem $$\Delta u = 1 \quad\text{in } \Omega$$ with homogeneous Dirichlet boundary conditions $$ u = 0 \quad\text{on } \partial\Omega$$
The example illustrates the use of the basic MFEM classes for defining the mesh, finite element space, as well as linear and bilinear forms corresponding to the lefthand side and righthand side of the discrete linear system.
The example has serial (ex0.cpp) and parallel (ex0p.cpp) versions.
Example 1: Laplace Problem
This example code demonstrates the use of MFEM to define a simple isoparametric finite element discretization of the Laplace problem $$\Delta u = 1$$ with homogeneous Dirichlet boundary conditions. Specifically, we discretize with the finite element space coming from the mesh (linear by default, quadratic for quadratic curvilinear mesh, NURBS for NURBS mesh, etc.) The problem solved in this example is the same as ex0, but with more sophisticated options and features.
The example highlights the use of mesh refinement, finite element grid functions, as well as linear and bilinear forms corresponding to the lefthand side and righthand side of the discrete linear system. We also cover the explicit elimination of essential boundary conditions, static condensation, and the optional connection to the GLVis tool for visualization.
The example has a serial (ex1.cpp), a parallel (ex1p.cpp), and HPC versions: performance/ex1.cpp, performance/ex1p.cpp. It also has a PETSc modification in examples/petsc , a PUMI modification in examples/pumi and a Ginkgo modification in examples/ginkgo. Partial assembly and GPU devices are supported.
Example 2: Linear Elasticity
This example code solves a simple linear elasticity problem describing a multimaterial cantilever beam. Specifically, we approximate the weak form of $${\rm div}({\sigma}({\bf u})) = 0$$ where $${\sigma}({\bf u}) = \lambda\, {\rm div}({\bf u})\,I + \mu\,(\nabla{\bf u} + \nabla{\bf u}^T)$$ is the stress tensor corresponding to displacement field ${\bf u}$, and $\lambda$ and $\mu$ are the material Lame constants. The boundary conditions are ${\bf u}=0$ on the fixed part of the boundary with attribute 1, and ${\sigma}({\bf u})\cdot n = f$ on the remainder with $f$ being a constant pull down vector on boundary elements with attribute 2, and zero otherwise. The geometry of the domain is assumed to be as follows:
The example demonstrates the use of highorder and NURBS vector finite element spaces with the linear elasticity bilinear form, meshes with curved elements, and the definition of piecewise constant and vector coefficient objects. Static condensation is also illustrated.
The example has a serial (ex2.cpp) and a parallel (ex2p.cpp) version. It also has a PETSc modification in examples/petsc and a PUMI modification in examples/pumi. We recommend viewing Example 1 before viewing this example.
Example 3: Definite Maxwell Problem
This example code solves a simple 3D electromagnetic diffusion problem corresponding to the second order definite Maxwell equation $$\nabla\times\nabla\times\, E + E = f$$ with boundary condition $ E \times n $ = "given tangential field". Here, we use a given exact solution $E$ and compute the corresponding r.h.s. $f$. We discretize with Nedelec finite elements in 2D or 3D.
The example demonstrates the use of $H(curl)$ finite element spaces with the curlcurl and the (vector finite element) mass bilinear form, as well as the computation of discretization error when the exact solution is known. Static condensation is also illustrated.
The example has a serial (ex3.cpp) and a parallel (ex3p.cpp) version. It also has a PETSc modification in examples/petsc. Partial assembly and GPU devices are supported. We recommend viewing examples 12 before viewing this example.
Example 4: Graddiv Problem
This example code solves a simple 2D/3D $H(div)$ diffusion problem corresponding to the second order definite equation $${\rm grad}(\alpha\,{\rm div}(F)) + \beta F = f$$ with boundary condition $F \cdot n$ = "given normal field". Here we use a given exact solution $F$ and compute the corresponding right hand side $f$. We discretize with the RaviartThomas finite elements.
The example demonstrates the use of $H(div)$ finite element spaces with the graddiv and $H(div)$ vector finite element mass bilinear form, as well as the computation of discretization error when the exact solution is known. Bilinear form hybridization and static condensation are also illustrated.
The example has a serial (ex4.cpp) and a parallel (ex4p.cpp) version. It also has a PETSc modification in examples/petsc. Partial assembly and GPU devices are supported. We recommend viewing examples 13 before viewing this example.
Example 5: Darcy Problem
This example code solves a simple 2D/3D mixed Darcy problem corresponding to the saddle point system $$ \begin{array}{rcl} k\,{\bf u} + {\rm grad}\,p &=& f \\ {\rm div}\,{\bf u} &=& g \end{array} $$ with natural boundary condition $p = $ "given pressure". Here we use a given exact solution $({\bf u},p)$ and compute the corresponding right hand side $(f, g)$. We discretize with RaviartThomas finite elements (velocity $\bf u$) and piecewise discontinuous polynomials (pressure $p$).
The example demonstrates the use of the BlockMatrix and BlockOperator classes, as well as the collective saving of several grid functions in VisIt and ParaView formats.
The example has a serial (ex5.cpp) and a parallel (ex5p.cpp) version. It also has a PETSc modification in examples/petsc. Partial assembly is supported. We recommend viewing examples 14 before viewing this example.
Example 6: Laplace Problem with AMR
This is a version of Example 1 with a simple adaptive mesh refinement loop. The problem being solved is again the Laplace equation $$\Delta u = 1$$ with homogeneous Dirichlet boundary conditions. The problem is solved on a sequence of meshes which are locally refined in a conforming (triangles, tetrahedrons) or nonconforming (quadrilaterals, hexahedra) manner according to a simple ZZ error estimator.
The example demonstrates MFEM's capability to work with both conforming and nonconforming refinements, in 2D and 3D, on linear, curved and surface meshes. Interpolation of functions from coarse to fine meshes, as well as persistent GLVis visualization are also illustrated.
The example has a serial (ex6.cpp) and a parallel (ex6p.cpp) version. It also has a PETSc modification in examples/petsc and a PUMI modification in examples/pumi. Partial assembly and GPU devices are supported. We recommend viewing Example 1 before viewing this example.
Example 7: Surface Meshes
This example code demonstrates the use of MFEM to define a triangulation of a unit sphere and a simple isoparametric finite element discretization of the Laplace problem with mass term, $$\Delta u + u = f.$$
The example highlights mesh generation, the use of mesh refinement, highorder meshes and finite elements, as well as surfacebased linear and bilinear forms corresponding to the lefthand side and righthand side of the discrete linear system. Simple local mesh refinement is also demonstrated.
The example has a serial (ex7.cpp) and a parallel (ex7p.cpp) version. We recommend viewing Example 1 before viewing this example.
Example 8: DPG for the Laplace Problem
This example code demonstrates the use of the Discontinuous PetrovGalerkin (DPG) method in its primal 2x2 block form as a simple finite element discretization of the Laplace problem $$\Delta u = f$$ with homogeneous Dirichlet boundary conditions. We use highorder continuous trial space, a highorder interfacial (trace) space, and a highorder discontinuous test space defining a local dual ($H^{1}$) norm. We use the primal form of DPG, see "A primal DPG method without a firstorder reformulation", Demkowicz and Gopalakrishnan, CAM 2013.
The example highlights the use of interfacial (trace) finite elements and spaces, trace face integrators and the definition of block operators and preconditioners.
The example has a serial (ex8.cpp) and a parallel (ex8p.cpp) version. We recommend viewing examples 15 before viewing this example.
Example 9: DG Advection
This example code solves the timedependent advection equation $$\frac{\partial u}{\partial t} + v \cdot \nabla u = 0,$$ where $v$ is a given fluid velocity, and $u_0(x)=u(0,x)$ is a given initial condition.
The example demonstrates the use of Discontinuous Galerkin (DG) bilinear forms in MFEM (face integrators), the use of explicit and implicit (with block ILU preconditioning) ODE time integrators, the definition of periodic boundary conditions through periodic meshes, as well as the use of GLVis for persistent visualization of a timeevolving solution. The saving of timedependent data files for external visualization with VisIt and ParaView is also illustrated.
The example has a serial (ex9.cpp) and a parallel (ex9p.cpp) version. It also has a SUNDIALS modification in examples/sundials , a PETSc modification in examples/petsc, and a HiOp modification in examples/hiop.
Example 10: Nonlinear Elasticity
This example solves a time dependent nonlinear elasticity problem of the form $$ \frac{dv}{dt} = H(x) + S v\,,\qquad \frac{dx}{dt} = v\,, $$ where $H$ is a hyperelastic model and $S$ is a viscosity operator of Laplacian type. The geometry of the domain is assumed to be as follows:
The example demonstrates the use of nonlinear operators, as well as their implicit time integration using a Newton method for solving an associated reduced backwardEuler type nonlinear equation. Each Newton step requires the inversion of a Jacobian matrix, which is done through a (preconditioned) inner solver.
The example has a serial (ex10.cpp) and a parallel (ex10p.cpp) version. It also has a SUNDIALS modification in examples/sundials and a PETSc modification in examples/petsc. We recommend viewing examples 2 and 9 before viewing this example.
Example 11: Laplace Eigenproblem
This example code demonstrates the use of MFEM to solve the eigenvalue problem $$\Delta u = \lambda u$$ with homogeneous Dirichlet boundary conditions.
We compute a number of the lowest eigenmodes by discretizing the Laplacian and Mass operators using a finite element space of the specified order, or an isoparametric/isogeometric space if order < 1 (quadratic for quadratic curvilinear mesh, NURBS for NURBS mesh, etc.)
The example highlights the use of the LOBPCG eigenvalue solver together with the BoomerAMG preconditioner in HYPRE, as well as optionally the SuperLU or STRUMPACK parallel direct solvers. Reusing a single GLVis visualization window for multiple eigenfunctions is also illustrated.
The example has only a parallel (ex11p.cpp) version. It also has a SLEPc modification in examples/petsc. We recommend viewing Example 1 before viewing this example.
Example 12: Linear Elasticity Eigenproblem
This example code solves the linear elasticity eigenvalue problem for a multimaterial cantilever beam. Specifically, we compute a number of the lowest eigenmodes by approximating the weak form of $${\rm div}({\sigma}({\bf u})) = \lambda {\bf u} \,,$$ where $${\sigma}({\bf u}) = \lambda\, {\rm div}({\bf u})\,I + \mu\,(\nabla{\bf u} + \nabla{\bf u}^T)$$ is the stress tensor corresponding to displacement field $\bf u$, and $\lambda$ and $\mu$ are the material Lame constants. The boundary conditions are ${\bf u}=0$ on the fixed part of the boundary with attribute 1, and ${\sigma}({\bf u})\cdot n = f$ on the remainder. The geometry of the domain is assumed to be as follows:
The example highlights the use of the LOBPCG eigenvalue solver together with the BoomerAMG preconditioner in HYPRE. Reusing a single GLVis visualization window for multiple eigenfunctions is also illustrated.
The example has only a parallel (ex12p.cpp) version. We recommend viewing examples 2 and 11 before viewing this example.
Example 13: Maxwell Eigenproblem
This example code solves the Maxwell (electromagnetic) eigenvalue problem $$\nabla\times\nabla\times\, E = \lambda\, E $$ with homogeneous Dirichlet boundary conditions $E \times n = 0$.
We compute a number of the lowest nonzero eigenmodes by discretizing the curl curl operator using a Nedelec finite element space of the specified order in 2D or 3D.
The example highlights the use of the AME subspace eigenvalue solver from HYPRE, which uses LOBPCG and AMS internally. Reusing a single GLVis visualization window for multiple eigenfunctions is also illustrated.
The example has only a parallel (ex13p.cpp) version. We recommend viewing examples 3 and 11 before viewing this example.
Example 14: DG Diffusion
This example code demonstrates the use of MFEM to define a discontinuous Galerkin (DG) finite element discretization of the Laplace problem $$\Delta u = 1$$ with homogeneous Dirichlet boundary conditions. Finite element spaces of any order, including zero on regular grids, are supported. The example highlights the use of discontinuous spaces and DGspecific face integrators.
The example has a serial (ex14.cpp) and a parallel (ex14p.cpp) version. We recommend viewing examples 1 and 9 before viewing this example.
Example 15: Dynamic AMR
Building on Example 6, this example demonstrates dynamic adaptive mesh refinement. The mesh is adapted to a timedependent solution by refinement as well as by derefinement. For simplicity, the solution is prescribed and no time integration is done. However, the error estimation and refinement/derefinement decisions are realistic.
At each outer iteration the right hand side function is changed to mimic a time dependent problem. Within each inner iteration the problem is solved on a sequence of meshes which are locally refined according to a simple ZZ error estimator. At the end of the inner iteration the error estimates are also used to identify any elements which may be overrefined and a single derefinement step is performed. After each refinement or derefinement step a rebalance operation is performed to keep the mesh evenly distributed among the available processors.
The example demonstrates MFEM's capability to refine, derefine and load balance nonconforming meshes, in 2D and 3D, and on linear, curved and surface meshes. Interpolation of functions between coarse and fine meshes, persistent GLVis visualization, and saving of timedependent fields for external visualization with VisIt are also illustrated.
The example has a serial (ex15.cpp) and a parallel (ex15p.cpp) version. We recommend viewing examples 1, 6 and 9 before viewing this example.
Example 16: Time Dependent Heat Conduction
This example code solves a simple 2D/3D time dependent nonlinear heat conduction problem $$\frac{du}{dt} = \nabla \cdot \left( \kappa + \alpha u \right) \nabla u$$ with a natural insulating boundary condition $\frac{du}{dn} = 0$. We linearize the problem by using the temperature field $u$ from the previous time step to compute the conductivity coefficient.
This example demonstrates both implicit and explicit time integration as well as a single Picard step method for linearization. The saving of time dependent data files for external visualization with VisIt is also illustrated.
The example has a serial (ex16.cpp) and a parallel (ex16p.cpp) version. We recommend viewing examples 2, 9, and 10 before viewing this example.
Example 17: DG Linear Elasticity
This example code solves a simple linear elasticity problem describing a multimaterial cantilever beam using symmetric or nonsymmetric discontinuous Galerkin (DG) formulation.
Specifically, we approximate the weak form of $${\rm div}({\sigma}({\bf u})) = 0$$ where $${\sigma}({\bf u}) = \lambda\, {\rm div}({\bf u})\,I + \mu\,(\nabla{\bf u} + \nabla{\bf u}^T)$$ is the stress tensor corresponding to displacement field ${\bf u}$, and $\lambda$ and $\mu$ are the material Lame constants. The boundary conditions are Dirichlet, $\bf{u}=\bf{u_D}$, on the fixed part of the boundary, namely boundary attributes 1 and 2; on the rest of the boundary we use ${\sigma}({\bf u})\cdot n = {\bf 0}$. The geometry of the domain is assumed to be as follows:
The example demonstrates the use of highorder DG vector finite element spaces with the linear DG elasticity bilinear form, meshes with curved elements, and the definition of piecewise constant and function vectorcoefficient objects. The use of nonhomogeneous Dirichlet b.c. imposed weakly, is also illustrated.
The example has a serial (ex17.cpp) and a parallel (ex17p.cpp) version. We recommend viewing examples 2 and 14 before viewing this example.
Example 18: DG Euler Equations
This example code solves the compressible Euler system of equations, a model nonlinear hyperbolic PDE, with a discontinuous Galerkin (DG) formulation. The primary purpose is to show how a transient system of nonlinear equations can be formulated in MFEM. The equations are solved in conservative form
$$\frac{\partial u}{\partial t} + \nabla \cdot {\bf F}(u) = 0$$
with a state vector $u = [ \rho, \rho v_0, \rho v_1, \rho E ]$, where $\rho$ is the density, $v_i$ is the velocity in the $i^{\rm th}$ direction, $E$ is the total specific energy, and $H = E + p / \rho$ is the total specific enthalpy. The pressure, $p$ is computed through a simple equation of state (EOS) call. The conservative hydrodynamic flux ${\bf F}$ in each direction $i$ is
$${\bf F_{\it i}} = [ \rho v_i, \rho v_0 v_i + p \delta_{i,0}, \rho v_1 v_i + p \delta_{i,1}, \rho v_i H ]$$
Specifically, the example solves for an exact solution of the equations whereby a vortex is transported by a uniform flow. Since all boundaries are periodic here, the method's accuracy can be assessed by measuring the difference between the solution and the initial condition at a later time when the vortex returns to its initial location.
Note that as the order of the spatial discretization increases, the timestep
must become smaller. This example currently uses a simple estimate derived by
Cockburn and Shu
for the 1D RKDG method. An additional factor can be tuned by passing the cfl
(or c
shorter) flag.
The example demonstrates userdefined bilinear and nonlinear form integrators for systems of equations that are defined with block vectors, and how these are used with an operator for explicit time integrators. In this case the system also involves an external approximate Riemann solver for the DG interface flux. It also demonstrates how to use GLVis for insitu visualization of vector grid functions.
The example has a serial (ex18.cpp) and a parallel (ex18p.cpp) version. We recommend viewing examples 9, 14 and 17 before viewing this example.
Example 19: Incompressible Nonlinear Elasticity
This example code solves the quasistatic incompressible nonlinear hyperelasticity equations. Specifically, it solves the nonlinear equation $$ \nabla \cdot \sigma(F) = 0 $$ subject to the constraint $$ \text{det } F = 1 $$ where $\sigma$ is the Cauchy stress and $F_{ij} = \delta_{ij} + u_{i,j}$ is the deformation gradient. To handle the incompressibility constraint, pressure is included as an independent unknown $p$ and the stress response is modeled as an incompressible neoHookean hyperelastic solid. The geometry of the domain is assumed to be as follows:
This formulation requires solving the saddle point system $$ \left[ \begin{array}{cc} K &B^T \\ B & 0 \end{array} \right] \left[\begin{array}{c} \Delta u \\ \Delta p \end{array} \right] = \left[\begin{array}{c} R_u \\ R_p \end{array} \right] $$ at each Newton step. To solve this linear system, we implement a specialized block preconditioner of the form $$ P^{1} = \left[\begin{array}{cc} I & \tilde{K}^{1}B^T \\ 0 & I \end{array} \right] \left[\begin{array}{cc} \tilde{K}^{1} & 0 \\ 0 & \gamma \tilde{S}^{1} \end{array} \right] $$ where $\tilde{K}^{1}$ is an approximation of the inverse of the stiffness matrix $K$ and $\tilde{S}^{1}$ is an approximation of the inverse of the Schur complement $S = BK^{1}B^T$. To approximate the Schur complement, we use the mass matrix for the pressure variable $p$.
The example demonstrates how to solve nonlinear systems of equations that are defined with block vectors as well as how to implement specialized block preconditioners for use in iterative solvers.
The example has a serial (ex19.cpp) and a parallel (ex19p.cpp) version. We recommend viewing examples 2, 5 and 10 before viewing this example.
Example 20: Symplectic Integration of Hamiltonian Systems
This example demonstrates the use of the variable order, symplectic time integration algorithm. Symplectic integration algorithms are designed to conserve energy when integrating systems of ODEs which are derived from Hamiltonian systems.
Hamiltonian systems define the energy of a system as a function of time (t), a set of generalized coordinates (q), and their corresponding generalized momenta (p). $$ H(q,p,t) = T(p) + V(q,t) $$ Hamilton's equations then specify how q and p evolve in time: $$ \frac{dq}{dt} = \frac{dH}{dp}\,,\qquad \frac{dp}{dt} = \frac{dH}{dq} $$
To use the symplectic integration classes we need to define an mfem::Operator
${\bf P}$ which evaluates the action of dH/dp, and an
mfem::TimeDependentOperator
${\bf F}$ which computes dH/dq.
This example visualizes its results as an evolution in phase space by defining the axes to be $q$, $p$, and $t$ rather than $x$, $y$, and $z$. In this space we build a ribbonlike mesh with nodes at $(0,0,t)$ and $(q,p,t)$. Finally we plot the energy as a function of time as a scalar field on this ribbonlike mesh. This scheme highlights any variations in the energy of the system.
This example offers five simple 1D Hamiltonians:
 Simple Harmonic Oscillator (mass on a spring) $$H = \frac{1}{2}\left( \frac{p^2}{m} + \frac{q^2}{k} \right)$$
 Pendulum $$H = \frac{1}{2}\left[ \frac{p^2}{m}  k \left( 1  cos(q) \right) \right]$$
 Gaussian Potential Well $$H = \frac{p^2}{2m}  k e^{q^2 / 2}$$
 Quartic Potential $$H = \frac{1}{2}\left[ \frac{p^2}{m} + k \left( 1 + q^2 \right) q^2 \right]$$
 Negative Quartic Potential $$H = \frac{1}{2}\left[ \frac{p^2}{m} + k \left( 1  \frac{q^2}{8} \right) q^2 \right]$$
In all cases these Hamiltonians are shifted by constant values so that the energy will remain positive. The mean and standard deviation of the computed energies at each time step are displayed upon completion.
When run in parallel, each processor integrates the same Hamiltonian system but starting from different initial conditions.
The example has a serial (ex20.cpp) and a parallel (ex20p.cpp) version. See the Maxwell miniapp for another application of symplectic integration.
Example 21: Adaptive mesh refinement for linear elasticity
This is a version of Example 2 with a simple adaptive mesh refinement loop. The problem being solved is again linear elasticity describing a multimaterial cantilever beam. The problem is solved on a sequence of meshes which are locally refined in a conforming (triangles, tetrahedrons) or nonconforming (quadrilaterals, hexahedra) manner according to a simple ZZ error estimator.
The example demonstrates MFEM's capability to work with both conforming and nonconforming refinements, in 2D and 3D, on linear and curved meshes. Interpolation of functions from coarse to fine meshes, as well as persistent GLVis visualization are also illustrated.
The example has a serial (ex21.cpp) and a parallel (ex21p.cpp) version. We recommend viewing Examples 2 and 6 before viewing this example.
Example 22: Complex Linear Systems
This example code demonstrates the use of MFEM to define and solve a complexvalued linear system. It implements three variants of a damped harmonic oscillator:

A scalar $H^1$ field: $$\nabla\cdot\left(a \nabla u\right)  \omega^2 b\,u + i\,\omega\,c\,u = 0$$

A vector $H(curl)$ field: $$\nabla\times\left(a\nabla\times\vec{u}\right)  \omega^2 b\,\vec{u} + i\,\omega\,c\,\vec{u} = 0$$

A vector $H(div)$ field: $$\nabla\left(a \nabla\cdot\vec{u}\right)  \omega^2 b\,\vec{u} + i\,\omega\,c\,\vec{u} = 0$$
In each case the field is driven by a forced oscillation, with angular frequency $\omega$, imposed at the boundary or a portion of the boundary.
The example also demonstrates how to display a timevarying solution as a sequence of fields sent to a single GLVis socket.
The example has a serial (ex22.cpp) and a parallel (ex22p.cpp) version. We recommend viewing examples 1, 3, and 4 before viewing this example.
Example 23: Wave Problem
This example code solves a simple 2D/3D wave equation with a second order time derivative: $$\frac{\partial^2 u}{\partial t^2}  c^2\Delta u = 0$$ The boundary conditions are either Dirichlet or Neumann.
The example demonstrates the use of time dependent operators, implicit solvers and second order time integration.
The example has only a serial (ex23.cpp) version. We recommend viewing examples 9 and 10 before viewing this example.
Example 24: Mixed finite element spaces
This example code illustrates usage of mixed finite element spaces, with three variants:
 $H^1 \times H(curl)$
 $H(curl) \times H(div)$
 $H(div) \times L_2$
Using different approaches for demonstration purposes, we project or interpolate a gradient, curl, or divergence in the appropriate spaces, comparing the errors in each case.
Partial assembly and GPU devices are supported.
The example has a serial (ex24.cpp) and a parallel (ex24p.cpp) version. We recommend viewing examples 1 and 3 before viewing this example.
Example 25: Perfectly Matched Layers
The example illustrates the use of a Perfectly Matched Layer (PML) for the simulation of timeharmonic electromagnetic waves propagating in unbounded domains.
PML was originally introduced by Berenger in "A Perfectly Matched Layer for the Absorption of Electromagnetic Waves". It is a technique used to solve wave propagation problems posed in infinite domains. The implementation involves the introduction of an artificial absorbing layer that minimizes undesired reflections. Inside this layer a complex coordinate stretching map is used which forces the wave modes to decay exponentially.
The example solves the indefinite Maxwell equations $$\nabla \times (a \nabla \times E)  \omega^2 b E = f.$$ where $a = \mu^{1} J^{1} J^T J$, $b= \epsilon J J^{1} J^{T}$ and $J$ is the Jacobian matrix of the coordinate transformation.
The example demonstrates discretization with Nedelec finite elements in 2D or 3D, as well as the use of complexvalued bilinear and linear forms. Several test problems are included, with known exact solutions.
The example has a serial (ex25.cpp) and a parallel (ex25p.cpp) version. We recommend viewing Example 22 before viewing this example.
Example 26: Multigrid Preconditioner
This example code demonstrates the use of MFEM to define a simple isoparametric finite element discretization of the Laplace problem $$\Delta u = 1$$ with homogeneous Dirichlet boundary conditions and how to solve it efficiently using a matrixfree multigrid preconditioner.
The example highlights on the creation of a hierarchy of discretization spaces and diffusion bilinear forms using partial assembly. The levels in the hierarchy of finite element spaces maybe constructed through geometric or order refinements. Moreover, the construction of a multigrid preconditioner for the PCG solver is shown. The multigrid uses a PCG solver on the coarsest level and second order Chebyshev accelerated smoothers on the other levels.
The example has a serial (ex26.cpp) and a parallel (ex26p.cpp) version. We recommend viewing Example 1 before viewing this example.
Example 27: Laplace Boundary Conditions
This example code demonstrates the use of MFEM to define a simple finite element discretization of the Laplace problem: $$ \Delta u = 0 $$ with a variety of boundary conditions.
Specifically, we discretize using a FE space of the specified order using a continuous or discontinuous space. We then apply Dirichlet, Neumann (both homogeneous and inhomogeneous), Robin, and Periodic boundary conditions on different portions of a predefined mesh.
Boundary conditions:  

$u = u_{dbc}$  on $\Gamma_{dbc}$ 
$\hat{n}\cdot\nabla u = g_{nbc}$  on $\Gamma_{nbc}$ 
$\hat{n}\cdot\nabla u = 0$  on $\Gamma_{nbc_0}$ 
$\hat{n}\cdot\nabla u + a u = b$  on $\Gamma_{rbc}$ 
as well as periodic boundary conditions which are enforced topologically.
The example has a serial (ex27.cpp) and a parallel (ex27p.cpp) version. We recommend viewing examples 1 and 14 before viewing this example.
Example 28: Constraints and Sliding Boundary Conditions
This example code illustrates the use of constraints in linear solvers by solving an elasticity problem where the normal component of the displacement is constrained to zero on two boundaries but tangential displacement is allowed.
The constraints can be enforced in several different ways, including eliminating them from the linear system or solving a saddlepoint system that explicitly includes constraint conditions.
The example has a serial (ex28.cpp) and a parallel (ex28p.cpp) version. We recommend viewing example 2 before viewing this example.
Example 29: Solving PDEs on embedded surfaces
This example demonstrates setting up and solving an anisotropic Laplace problem $$\nabla\cdot(\sigma\nabla u) = 1 \quad\text{in } \Omega$$ with homogeneous Dirichlet boundary conditions $$ u = 0 \quad\text{on } \partial\Omega$$ where $\Omega$ is a two dimensional curved surface embedded in three dimensions and $\sigma$ is an anisotropic diffusion tensor.
The example demonstrates and validates our DiffusionIntegrator
's ability to
properly integrate three dimensional fluxes on a two dimensional domain. Not
all of our integrators currently support such cases but the
DiffusionIntegrator
can be used as a simple example of how extend other
integrators when necessary.
The example has a serial (ex29.cpp) and a parallel (ex29p.cpp) version. We recommend viewing examples 1 and 7 before viewing this example.
Example 30: Resolving rough and finescale problem data
Unresolved problem data will affect the accuracy of a discretized PDE solution as
well as a posteriori estimates of the solution error.
This example uses a CoefficientRefiner
object to preprocess an input mesh until
the resolution of the prescribed problem data $f \in L^2$ is below a prescribed
tolerance. In this example, the resolution is identified with a data oscillation
function on the mesh $\mathcal{T}$, defined
$$ \mathrm{osc}(f) = \Big( \sum_{T\in\mathcal{T}} \ h \cdot (I  \Pi)\, f \^2_{L^2(T)} \Big)^{1/2}, $$
where $h$ is the local element size function and $\Pi$ is a finite element projection
operator, and the sum is taken over all elements $T$ in the mesh.
In this example, the coarse initial mesh is adaptively refined until $\mathrm{osc}(f)$ is below a prescribed tolerance for various candidate functions $f \in L^2$. When using rough problem data, it is recommended to perform this type of preprocessing before a posteriori error estimation.
The example has a serial (ex30.cpp) and a parallel (ex30p.cpp) version. We recommend viewing examples 1 and 6 before viewing this example.
Example 31: Anisotropic Definite Maxwell Problem
This example code solves a simple electromagnetic diffusion problem corresponding to the second order definite Maxwell equation $$\nabla\times\nabla\times\, E + \sigma E = f$$ with boundary condition $ E \times n $ = "given tangential field". In this example $\sigma$ is an anisotropic 3x3 tensor. Here, we use a given exact solution $E$ and compute the corresponding r.h.s. $f$. We discretize with Nedelec finite elements in 1D, 2D, or 3D.
The example demonstrates the use of restricted $H(curl)$ finite element spaces with the curlcurl and the (vector finite element) mass bilinear form, as well as the computation of discretization error when the exact solution is known. These restricted spaces allow the solution of 1D or 2D electromagnetic problems which involve 3D field vectors. Such problems arise in plasma physics and crystallography.
The example has a serial (ex31.cpp) and a parallel (ex31p.cpp) version. We recommend viewing example 3 before viewing this example.
Example 32: Anisotropic Maxwell Eigenproblem
This example code solves the Maxwell (electromagnetic) eigenvalue problem with anisotropic permittivity, $\epsilon$ $$\nabla\times\nabla\times\, E = \lambda\, \epsilon E $$ with homogeneous Dirichlet boundary conditions $E \times n = 0$.
We compute a number of the lowest nonzero eigenmodes by discretizing the curl curl operator using a Nedelec finite element space of the specified order in 1D, 2D, or 3D.
The example demonstrates the use of restricted $H(curl)$ finite element spaces in an eigenmode context. These restricted spaces allow the solution of 1D or 2D electromagnetic problems which involve 3D field vectors. Such problems arise in plasma physics and crystallography. The example highlights the use of the AME subspace eigenvalue solver from HYPRE, which uses LOBPCG and AMS internally. Reusing multiple GLVis visualization windows for multiple eigenfunctions is also illustrated.
The example has only a parallel (ex32p.cpp) version. We recommend viewing examples 13 and 31 before viewing this example.
Example 33: Spectral fractional Laplacian
This example code demonstrates the use of MFEM to solve the fractional Laplacian problem $$ (\Delta)^\alpha u = 1, \quad \alpha > 0, $$ with homogeneous Dirichlet boundary conditions. The problem solved in this example is similar to ex1, but involves a fractionalorder diffusion operator whose inverse can be approximated by a series of inverses of integerorder diffusion operators. Solving each of these independent integerorder PDEs with MFEM and summing their solutions results in a discrete solution to the fractional Laplacian problem above.
The example has a serial (ex33.cpp) and a parallel (ex33p.cpp) version. We recommend viewing Example 1 before viewing this example.
Example 34: Source Function using a SubMesh Transfer
This example demonstrates the use of a SubMesh object to transfer solution data from a subdomain and use this as a source function on the full domain. In this case we compute a volumetric current density $\vec{J}$ as the gradient of a scalar potential $\varphi$ on a portion of the domain.
$$\nabla\cdot(\sigma\nabla\varphi)=0$$ $$\vec{J} = \sigma\nabla\varphi$$
Where a voltage difference is applied on surfaces of the subdomain (shown on the left) to generate the current density restricted to this subdomain. The current density is then transferred to the full domain (shown on the right) using a SubMesh object.
We then use this current density on the full domain as a source term in a magnetostatic solve for a vector potential $\vec{A}$.
$$\nabla\times(\mu^{1}\nabla\times\vec{A})=\vec{J}$$ $$\vec{B} = \nabla\times\vec{A}$$
This example verifies the recreation of boundary attributes on a subdomain mesh as well as transfer of RaviartThomas vector fields between the SubMesh and the full Mesh. Note that the data transfer in this particular example involves arbitrary order RaviartThomas degrees of freedom on a mixture of tetrahedral and triangular prism elements.
The example has a serial (ex34.cpp) and a parallel (ex34p.cpp) version. We recommend viewing Examples 1 and 3 before viewing this example.
Example 35: Port Boundary Conditions using SubMesh Transfers
This example demonstrates the use of a SubMesh object to transfer a port
boundary condition
from a portion of the boundary to the corresponding portion
of the full domain.
Just as in Example 22 this example implements three variants of a damped harmonic oscillator:

A scalar $H^1$ field: $$\nabla\cdot\left(a \nabla u\right)  \omega^2 b\,u + i\,\omega\,c\,u = 0\mbox{ with }u_\Gamma=v$$

A vector $H(curl)$ field: $$\nabla\times\left(a\nabla\times\vec{u}\right)  \omega^2 b\,\vec{u} + i\,\omega\,c\,\vec{u} = 0\mbox{ with }\hat{n}\times(\vec{u}\times\hat{n})_\Gamma=\vec{v}$$

A vector $H(div)$ field: $$\nabla\left(a \nabla\cdot\vec{u}\right)  \omega^2 b\,\vec{u} + i\,\omega\,c\,\vec{u} = 0\mbox{ with }\hat{n}\cdot\vec{u}_\Gamma=v$$
Where $\Gamma$ is a portion of the boundary called the port
. In each case the
field is driven by a forced oscillation, with angular frequency $\omega$,
imposed at the boundary or a portion of the boundary.
In Example 22 this boundary condition was simply a constant in space. In this
example the boundary condition is an eigenmode of a lower dimensional
eignevalue problem defined on a portion of the boundary as follows:

For the scalar $H^1$ field: $$\nabla\cdot\left(\nabla v\right) = \lambda\,v\mbox{ with }v_{\partial\Gamma}=0$$

For the vector $H(curl)$ field: $$\nabla\times\left(\nabla\times\vec{v}\right) = \lambda\,\vec{v}\mbox{ with }\hat{n}_{\partial\Gamma}\times\vec{v}_{\partial\Gamma}=0$$

For the vector $H(div)$ field: $$\nabla\cdot\left(\nabla v\right) = \lambda\,v\mbox{ with }\hat{n}_{\partial\Gamma}\cdot\nabla v_{\partial\Gamma}=0$$
The different cases implemented in this example can be used to verify the transfer of an $H^1$ scalar field, the tangential components of an $H(curl)$ vector field, and the normal component of an $H(div)$ vector field (as a scalar $L^2$ field in this case) between a SubMesh and its parent mesh.
The example has only a parallel (ex35p.cpp) version because the eigenmode solver used to compute the field on the port is only implemented in parallel. We recommend viewing Examples 11, 13, and 22 before viewing this example.
Example 36: Obstacle Problem
This example code solves the pointwise boundconstrained energy minimization problem $$ \text{minimize } \frac{1}{2}\\nabla u\^2 \text{ in } H^1_0(\Omega)\, \text{ subject to } u \ge \varphi\,.$$ This is known as the obstacle problem, and it is a classical motivating example in the study of variational inequalities and free boundary problems. In this example, the obstacle $\varphi$ is the graph of a halfsphere centered at the origin of a circular domain $\Omega$. After solving to a specified tolerance, the numerical solution is compared to a closedform exact solution to assess its accuracy.
The problem is solved using the Proximal Galerkin finite element method, which is a nonlinear, structurepreserving mixed method for pointwise bound constraints proposed by Keith and Surowiec. In turn, this example highlights MFEM's ability to deliver highorder solutions to variational inequalities and showcases how to set up and solve nonlinear mixed methods.
The example has a serial (ex36.cpp) and a parallel (ex36p.cpp) version. We recommend viewing Example 1 before viewing this example.
Example 37: Topology Optimization
This example code solves a classical cantilevel beam topology optimization problem. The aim is to find an optimal material density field $\rho$ in $L^1(\Omega)$ to minimize the elastic compliance; i.e., $$\begin{align} &\text{minimize} \int_\Omega \mathbf{f} \cdot \mathbf{u}(\rho)\, \mathrm{d}x\, \text{ over }\, \rho \in L^1(\Omega) \\ &\text{subject to }\, 0 \leq \rho \leq 1\, \text{ and } \int_\Omega \rho\, \mathrm{d}x = \theta\, \mathrm{vol}(\Omega) \,. \end{align}$$ In this problem, $\mathbf{f}$ is a localized force and the linearly elastic displacement field $\mathbf{u} = \mathbf{u}(\rho)$ is determined by a material density field $\rho$ with total volume fraction $0<\theta<1$.
The problem is solved using a mirror descent algorithm proposed by Keith and Surowiec. For further details, see the more elaborate description of this PDEconstrained optimization problem given in the example code and the aforementioned paper.
The example has a serial (ex37.cpp) and a parallel (ex37p.cpp) version. We recommend viewing Example 2 before viewing this example.
Example 38: CutVolume and CutSurface Integration
This example code demonstrates construction of cutsurface and cutvolume IntegrationRules. The cut is specified by the zero level set of a given Coefficient $\phi$. The resulting IntegrationRules are combined with standard LinearFormIntegrators to demonstrate integration of a function $u$ over an implicit interface, and a subdomain bounded by an implicit interface: $$ S = \int_{\phi = 0} u(x) ~ ds, \quad V = \int_{\phi > 0} u(x) ~ dx. $$
The IntegrationRules are constructed by the momentfitting algorithm introduced by MÃ¼ller, Kummer and Oberlack. Through a set of basis functions, for each element the method defines and solves a local underdetermined system for the vector of quadrature weights. All surface and volume integrals, which are required to form the system, are reduced to 1D integration over intersected segments.
The example has only a serial (ex38.cpp) version, because the construction of the integration rules is an elementlocal procedure. It requires MFEM to be built with LAPACK, which is used to find the optimal solution of an underdetermined system of equations.
Volta Miniapp: Electrostatics
This miniapp demonstrates the use of MFEM to solve realistic problems in the field of linear electrostatics. Its features include:
 dielectric materials
 charge densities
 surface charge densities
 prescribed voltages
 applied polarizations
 high order meshes
 high order basis functions
 adaptive mesh refinement
 advanced visualization
For more details, please see the documentation in the
miniapps/electromagnetics
directory.
The miniapp has only a parallel (volta.cpp) version. We recommend that new users start with the example codes before moving to the miniapps.
Tesla Miniapp: Magnetostatics
This miniapp showcases many of MFEM's features while solving a variety of realistic magnetostatics problems. Its features include:
 diamagnetic and/or paramagnetic materials
 ferromagnetic materials
 volumetric current densities
 surface current densities
 external fields
 high order meshes
 high order basis functions
 adaptive mesh refinement
 advanced visualization
For more details, please see the documentation in the
miniapps/electromagnetics
directory.
The miniapp has only a parallel (tesla.cpp) version. We recommend that new users start with the example codes before moving to the miniapps.
Maxwell Miniapp: Transient FullWave Electromagnetics
This miniapp solves the equations of transient fullwave electromagnetics.
Its features include:
 mixed formulation of the coupled firstorder Maxwell equations
 $H(\mathrm{curl})$ discretization of the electric field
 $H(\mathrm{div})$ discretization of the magnetic flux
 energy conserving, variable order, implicit time integration
 dielectric materials
 diamagnetic and/or paramagnetic materials
 conductive materials
 volumetric current densities
 Sommerfeld absorbing boundary conditions
 high order meshes
 high order basis functions
 advanced visualization
For more details, please see the documentation in the
miniapps/electromagnetics
directory.
The miniapp has only a parallel (maxwell.cpp) version. We recommend that new users start with the example codes before moving to the miniapps.
Joule Miniapp: Transient Magnetics and Joule Heating
This miniapp solves the equations of transient lowfrequency (a.k.a. eddy current) electromagnetics, and simultaneously computes transient heat transfer with the heat source given by the electromagnetic Joule heating.
Its features include:
 $H^1$ discretization of the electrostatic potential
 $H(\mathrm{curl})$ discretization of the electric field
 $H(\mathrm{div})$ discretization of the magnetic field
 $H(\mathrm{div})$ discretization of the heat flux
 $L^2$ discretization of the temperature
 implicit transient time integration
 high order meshes
 high order basis functions
 adaptive mesh refinement
 advanced visualization
For more details, please see the documentation in the
miniapps/electromagnetics
directory.
The miniapp has only a parallel (joule.cpp) version. We recommend that new users start with the example codes before moving to the miniapps.
Mobius Strip Miniapp
This miniapp generates various Mobius striplike surface meshes. It is a good way to generate complex surface meshes.
Manipulating the mesh topology and performing mesh transformation are demonstrated.
The mobiusstrip
mesh in the data
directory was generated with this miniapp.
For more details, please see the documentation in the
miniapps/meshing
directory.
The miniapp has only a serial (mobiusstrip.cpp) version. We recommend that new users start with the example codes before moving to the miniapps.
Klein Bottle Miniapp
This miniapp generates three types of Klein bottle surfaces. It is similar to the mobiusstrip miniapp.
Manipulating the mesh topology and performing mesh transformation are demonstrated.
The kleinbottle
and kleindonut
meshes in the data
directory were generated with this miniapp.
For more details, please see the documentation in the
miniapps/meshing
directory.
The miniapp has only a serial (kleinbottle.cpp) version. We recommend that new users start with the example codes before moving to the miniapps.
Toroid Miniapp
This miniapp generates two types of toroidal volume meshes; one with triangular cross sections and one with square cross sections. It works by defining a stack of individual elements and bending them so that the bottom and top of the stack can be joined to form a torus. It supports various options including:
 The element type: 0  Wedge, 1  Hexahedron
 The geometric order of the elements
 The major and minor radii
 The number of elements in the azimuthal direction
 The number of nodes to offset by before rejoining the stack
 The initial angle of the cross sectional shape
 The number of uniform refinement steps to apply
Along with producing some visually interesting meshes, this miniapp demonstrates how simple 3D meshes can be constructed and transformed in MFEM. It also produces a family of meshes with simple but nontrivial topology for testing various features in MFEM.
This miniapp has only a serial (toroid.cpp) version. We recommend that new users start with the example codes before moving to the miniapps.
Twist Miniapp
This miniapp generates simple periodic meshes to demonstrate MFEM's handling of periodic domains. MFEM's strategy is to use a discontinuous vector field to define the mesh coordinates on a topologically periodic mesh. It works by defining a stack of individual elements and stitching together the top and bottom of the mesh. The stack can also be twisted so that the vertices of the bottom and top can be joined with any integer offset (for tetrahedral and wedge meshes only even offsets are supported).
The Twist miniapp supports various options including:
 The element type: 4  Tetrahedron, 6  Wedge, 8  Hexahedron
 The geometric order of the elements
 The dimensions of the initial brickshaped stack of elements
 The number of elements in the z direction
 The number of nodes to offset by before rejoining the stack
 The number of uniform refinement steps to apply
Along with producing some visually interesting meshes, this miniapp demonstrates how simple 3D meshes can be constructed and transformed in MFEM. It also produces a family of meshes with simple but nontrivial topology for testing various features in MFEM.
This miniapp has only a serial (twist.cpp) version. We recommend that new users start with the example codes before moving to the miniapps.
Extruder Miniapp
This miniapp creates higher dimensional meshes from lower dimensional meshes by extrusion. Simple coordinate transformations can also be applied if desired.
 The initial mesh can be 1D or 2D
 1D meshes can be extruded in both the y and z directions
 2D meshes can be triangular, quadrilateral, or contain both element types
 Meshes with high order geometry are supported
 User can specify the number of elements and the distance to extrude
 Geometric order of the transformed mesh can be user selected or automatic
This miniapp provides another demonstration of how simple meshes can be constructed and transformed in MFEM.
This miniapp has only a serial (extruder.cpp) version. We recommend that new users start with the example codes before moving to the miniapps.
Trimmer Miniapp
This miniapp creates a new mesh file from an existing mesh by trimming away elements with selected attributes. Newly exposed boundary elements will be assigned new or user specified boundary attributes.
 The initial mesh can be 2D or 3D
 Meshes with high order geometry are supported
 Periodic meshes are supported
 NURBS meshes are not supported
This miniapp provides another demonstration of how simple meshes can be constructed in MFEM.
This miniapp has only a serial (trimmer.cpp) version. We recommend that new users start with the example codes before moving to the miniapps.
PolarNC Miniapp
This miniapp generates a circular sector mesh that consist of quadrilaterals and triangles of similar sizes. The 3D version of the mesh is made of prisms and tetrahedra.
The mesh is nonconforming by design, and can optionally be made curvilinear. The elements are ordered along a spacefilling curve by default, which makes the mesh ready for parallel nonconforming AMR in MFEM.
The implementation also demonstrates how to initialize a nonconforming mesh
on the fly by marking hanging nodes with Mesh::AddVertexParents
.
For more details, please see the documentation in the
miniapps/meshing
directory.
The miniapp has only a serial (polarnc.cpp) version. We recommend that new users start with the example codes before moving to the miniapps.
Shaper Miniapp
This miniapp performs multiple levels of adaptive mesh refinement to resolve the interfaces between different "materials" in the mesh, as specified by a given material function.
It can be used as a simple initial mesh generator, for example in the case when the interface is too complex to describe without local refinement. Both conforming and nonconforming refinements are supported.
For more details, please see the documentation in the
miniapps/meshing
directory.
The miniapp has only a serial (shaper.cpp) version. We recommend that new users start with the example codes before moving to the miniapps.
Mesh Explorer Miniapp
This miniapp is a handy tool to examine, visualize and manipulate a given mesh. Some of its features are:
 visualizing of mesh materials and individual mesh elements
 mesh scaling, randomization, and general transformation
 manipulation of the mesh curvature
 the ability to simulate parallel partitioning
 quantitative and visual reports of mesh quality
For more details, please see the documentation in the
miniapps/meshing
directory.
The miniapp has only a serial (meshexplorer.cpp) version. We recommend that new users start with the example codes before moving to the miniapps.
Mesh Optimizer Miniapp
This miniapp performs mesh optimization using the TargetMatrix Optimization Paradigm (TMOP) by P.Knupp et al., and a global variational minimization approach. It minimizes the quantity
$$\sum_T \int_T \mu(J(x)),$$
where $T$ are the target (ideal) elements, $J$ is the Jacobian of the transformation from the target to the physical element, and $\mu$ is the mesh quality metric.
This metric can measure shape, size or alignment of the region around each quadrature point. The combination of targets and quality metrics is used to optimize the physical node positions, i.e., they must be as close as possible to the shape / size / alignment of their targets.
This code also demonstrates a possible use of nonlinear operators, as well as their coupling to Newton methods for solving minimization problems. Note that the utilized Newton methods are oriented towards avoiding invalid meshes with negative Jacobian determinants. Each Newton step requires the inversion of a Jacobian matrix, which is done through an inner linear solver.
For more details, please see the documentation in the
miniapps/meshing
directory.
The miniapp has a serial (meshoptimizer.cpp) and a parallel (pmeshoptimizer.cpp) version. We recommend that new users start with the example codes before moving to the miniapps.
Minimal Surface Miniapp
This miniapp solves Plateau's problem: the Dirichlet problem for the minimal surface equation.
Options to solve the minimal surface equations of both parametric surfaces as well as surfaces restricted to be graphs of the form $z=f(x,y)$ are supported, including a number of examples such as the Catenoid, Helicoid, Costa and Schrek surfaces.
For more details, please see the documentation in the miniapps/meshing
directory.
The miniapp has a serial (minimalsurface.cpp) and a parallel (pminimalsurface.cpp) version. We recommend that new users start with the example codes before moving to the miniapps.
LowOrder Refined Transfer Miniapp
The lortransfer
miniapp, found under miniapps/tools
demonstrates the
capability to generate a loworder refined mesh from a highorder mesh, and to
transfer solutions between these meshes.
Grid functions can be transferred between the coarse, highorder mesh and the loworder refined mesh using either $L^2$ projection or pointwise evaluation. These transfer operators can be designed to discretely conserve mass and to recover the original highorder solution when transferring a loworder grid function that was obtained by restricting a highorder grid function to the loworder refined space.
The miniapp has only a serial (lortransfer.cpp) version. We recommend that new users start with the example codes before moving to the miniapps.
Interpolation Miniapps
The interpolation miniapp, found under miniapps/gslib
, demonstrate the
capability to interpolate highorder finite element functions at given set of
points in physical space.
These miniapps utilize the gslib
library's
highorder interpolation utility for quad and hex meshes:
 Find Points miniapp has a serial (findpts.cpp) and a parallel (pfindpts.cpp) version that demonstrate the basic procedures for point search and evaluation of grid functions.
 Field Interp miniapp (fieldinterp.cpp) demonstrates how grid functions can be transferred between meshes.
 Field Diff miniapp (fielddiff.cpp) demonstrates how grid functions on two different meshes can be compared with each other.
These miniapps require installation of the gslib
library. We recommend that new users start with the example codes before moving to the miniapps.
Extrapolation Miniapp
The extrapolate
miniapp, found in the miniapps/shifted
directory,
extrapolates a finite element function from a set of elements (known values) to
the rest of the domain. The set of elements that contains the known values is
specified by the positive values of a level set Coefficient. The known values
are not modified. The miniapp supports two PDEbased approaches
(Aslam, Bochkov & Gibou),
both of which rely on solving a sequence of advection problems in the
direction of the unknown parts of the domain. The extrapolation can be constant
(1st order), linear (2nd order), or quadratic (3rd order). These formal orders
hold for a limited band around the zero level set, see the above references for
further information.
The miniapp has only a parallel (extrapolate.cpp) version. We recommend that new users start with the example codes before moving to the miniapps.
Distance Solver Miniapp
The distance
miniapp, found in the miniapps/shifted
directory demonstrates the
capability to compute the "distance" to a given point source or to the zero
level set of a given function.
Here "distance" refers to the length of the shortest path through the mesh.
The input can be a DeltaCoefficient
(representing a point source),
or any Coefficient
(for the case of a level set).
The output is a ParGridFunction
that can be scalar (representing the scalar
distance), or a vector (its magnitude is the distance, and its direction is
the starting direction of the shortest path).
The miniapp has only a parallel (distance.cpp) version. We recommend that new users start with the example codes before moving to the miniapps.
Shifted Diffusion Miniapp
The diffusion
miniapp, found in the miniapps/shifted
directory, demonstrates
the capability to formulate a boundary value problem using a surrogate
computational domain. The method uses a distance function to the true boundary
to enforce Dirichlet boundary conditions on the (nonaligned) mesh faces,
therefore "shifting" the location where boundary conditions are imposed. The
implementation in the miniapp is a highorder extension of the
secondgeneration
shifted boundary method.
The miniapp has only a parallel (diffusion.cpp) version. We recommend that new users start with the example codes before moving to the miniapps.
Laghos Miniapp
Laghos (LAGrangian HighOrder Solver) is a miniapp that solves the timedependent Euler equations of compressible gas dynamics in a moving Lagrangian frame using unstructured highorder finite element spatial discretization and explicit highorder timestepping.
The computational motives captured in Laghos include:
 Support for unstructured meshes, in 2D and 3D, with quadrilateral and hexahedral elements (triangular and tetrahedral elements can also be used, but with the less efficient full assembly option). Serial and parallel mesh refinement options can be set via a commandline flag.
 Explicit timestepping loop with a variety of time integrator options. Laghos supports RungeKutta ODE solvers of orders 1, 2, 3, 4 and 6.
 Continuous and discontinuous highorder finite element discretization spaces of runtimespecified order.
 Moving (highorder) meshes.
 Separation between the assembly and the quadrature pointbased computations.
 Pointwise definition of mesh size, timestep estimate and artificial viscosity coefficient.
 Constantintime velocity mass operator that is inverted iteratively on each time step. This is an example of an operator that is prepared once (fully or partially assembled), but is applied many times. The application cost is dominant for this operator.
 Timedependent force matrix that is prepared every time step (fully or partially assembled) and is applied just twice per "assembly". Both the preparation and the application costs are important for this operator.
 Domaindecomposed MPI parallelism.
 Optional insitu visualization with GLVis and data output for visualization / data analysis with VisIt.
The Laghos miniapp is part of the CEED software suite, a collection of software benchmarks, miniapps, libraries and APIs for efficient exascale discretizations based on highorder finite element and spectral element methods. See https://github.com/ceed for more information and source code availability.
This is an external miniapp, available at https://github.com/CEED/Laghos.
Remhos Miniapp
Remhos (REMap HighOrder Solver) is a miniapp that solves the pure advection equations that are used to perform monotonic and conservative discontinuous field interpolation (remap) as part of the Eulerian phase in Arbitrary Lagrangian Eulerian (ALE) simulations.
The computational motives captured in Remhos include:
 Support for unstructured meshes, in 2D and 3D, with quadrilateral and hexahedral elements. Serial and parallel mesh refinement options can be set via a commandline flag.
 Explicit timestepping loop with a variety of time integrator options. Remhos supports RungeKutta ODE solvers of orders 1, 2, 3, 4 and 6.
 Discontinuous highorder finite element discretization spaces of runtimespecified order.
 Moving (highorder) meshes.
 Mass operator that is local per each zone. It is inverted by iterative or exact methods at each time step. This operator is constant in time (transport mode) or changing in time (remap mode). Options for full or partial assembly.
 Advection operator that couples neighboring zones. It is applied once at each time step. This operator is constant in time (transport mode) or changing in time (remap mode). Options for full or partial assembly.
 Domaindecomposed MPI parallelism.
 Optional insitu visualization with GLVis and data output for visualization and data analysis with VisIt.
The Remhos miniapp is part of the CEED software suite, a collection of software benchmarks, miniapps, libraries and APIs for efficient exascale discretizations based on highorder finite element and spectral element methods. See https://github.com/ceed for more information and source code availability.
This is an external miniapp, available at https://github.com/CEED/Remhos.
Block Solvers Miniapp
The Block Solvers miniapp, found under miniapps/solvers
, compares various linear solvers for the saddle
point system obtained from mixed finite element discretization of the Darcy's flow problem
\begin{array}{rcl}
k{\bf u} & + \nabla p & = f \\
\nabla \cdot {\bf u} & & = g
\end{array}
The solvers being compared include:
 The divergencefree solver (couple and decoupled modes), which is based on a multilevel decomposition of the RaviartThomas finite element space and its divergencefree subspace.
 MINRES preconditioned by the block diagonal preconditioner in ex5p.cpp.
For more details, please see the
documentation in the miniapps/solvers
directory.
The miniapp supports:
 Arbitrary order mixed finite element pair (RaviartThomas elements + piecewise discontinuous polynomials)
 Various combination of essential and natural boundary conditions
 Homogeneous or heterogeneous scalar coefficient k
This miniapp has only a parallel (blocksolvers.cpp) version. We recommend that new users start with the example codes before moving to the miniapps.
Overlapping Grids Miniapps
Overlapping gridsbased frameworks can often make problems tractable that are
otherwise inaccessible with a single conforming grid. The following
gslib
based miniapps in MFEM demonstrate how to set up and use overlapping grids:

The Schwarz Example 1 miniapp in
miniapps/gslib
has a serial (schwarz_ex1.cpp) a parallel (schwarz_ex1p.cpp) version that solves the Poisson problem on overlapping grids. The serial version is restricted to use two overlapping grids, while the parallel version supports arbitrary number of overlapping grids. 
The Navier Conjugate Heat Transfer miniapp in
miniapps/navier
(navier_cht.cpp) demonstrates how a conjugate heat transfer problem can be solved with the fluid dynamics (incompressible NavierStokes equations) and heat transfer (advectiondiffusion equation) PDEs modeled on different meshes.
These miniapps require installation of the gslib
library.
We recommend that new users start with the example codes before moving to the miniapps.
ParELAG AMGe for H(curl) and H(div) Miniapp
This is a miniapp that exhibits the ParELAG library and part of its capabilities. The miniapp employs MFEM and ParELAG to solve $H(\mathrm{curl})$ and $H(\mathrm{div})$elliptic forms by an element based algebraic multigrid (AMGe).
ParELAG is a library mostly developed at the Center for Applied Scientific Computing of Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, California, USA.
The miniapp uses:

A multilevel hierarchy of de Rham complexes of finite element spaces, built by ParELAG;

Hiptmairtype (hybrid) smoothers, implemented in ParELAG;

AMS (Auxiliaryspace Maxwell Solver) or ADS (Auxiliaryspace Divergence Solver), from HYPRE, for preconditioning or solving on the coarsest levels.
Alternatively, it is possible to precondition or solve the $H(\mathrm{div})$ form on the coarsest level via a hybridization approach. However, this is not yet implemented in ParELAG for the coarse levels. Only the hybridization solver that is directly applicable to an $H(\mathrm{div})$$L^2$ mixed (saddlepoint) system is currently available in ParELAG.
We recommend viewing ex3p.cpp and ex4p.cpp before viewing this miniapp.
For more details, please see the
documentation in the miniapps/parelag
directory.
This miniapp has only a parallel (MultilevelHcurlHdivSolver.cpp) version. We recommend that new users start with the example codes before moving to the miniapps.
Generating Gaussian Random Fields via the SPDE Method
This miniapp generates Gaussian random fields on meshed domains $\Omega \subset \mathbb{R}^n$ via the SPDE method. The method exploits a stochastic, fractional PDE whose fullspace solutions yield Gaussian random fields with a MatÃ©rn covariance. The method was introduced and popularized by Lindgren et. al in 2010. In this miniapp, we use a slightly modified representation following Khristenko et. al. More specifically, we solve the equation \begin{equation} \left( \frac{1}{2\nu} \nabla \cdot \left( \Theta \nabla \right) + \mathbf{1} \right)^{\frac{2\nu+n}{4}} u(x,w) = \eta W(x,w) \ \ \ \text{in} \ \ \Omega, \end{equation} with various boundary conditions. Solving this equation on $\Omega = \mathbb{R}^n$ delivers a homogeneous Gaussian random field with zero mean and MatÃ©rn covariance, \begin{align}\label{eq:MaternCovariance} C(x,y) &= \sigma^2M_\nu \left(\sqrt{2\nu}\, \ xy \_{\Theta} \right) , \end{align} where $M_\nu(z) = \frac{2^{1\nu}}{\Gamma(\nu)} z ^{\nu} K_\nu \left( z \right)$ and $\ xy \_{\Theta}^2 = (xy)^\top\Theta (xy)$. The MatÃ©rn model provides the regularity parameter $\nu > 0$ and the anisotropic diffusion tensor $\Theta \in \mathbb{R}^{n\times n}$, which determines the spatial structure (correlation lengths). However, applying boundary conditions to the SPDE above provides the ability to model a significantly larger class of inhomogeneous random fields on complex domains. For further details, see the miniapp README.
We recommend viewing ex33p.cpp before viewing this miniapp.
This miniapp (generate_random_field.cpp) has only a parallel implementation. It further requires MFEM to be built with LAPACK, otherwise you may only use predefined values for $\nu$. We recommend that new users start with the example codes before moving to the miniapps.
Multidomain and SubMesh demonstration Miniapp
This miniapp aims to demonstrate how to solve two PDEs, that represent different physics, on the same domain. MFEM's SubMesh interface is used to compute on and transfer between the spaces of predefined parts of the domain. For the sake of simplicity, the spaces on each domain are using the same order H1 finite elements. This does not mean that the approach is limited to this configuration.
A 3D domain comprised of an outer box with a cylinder shaped inside is used.
A heat equation is described on the outer box domain
\begin{align} \frac{\partial T}{\partial t} &= \kappa \Delta T &&\mbox{in outer box}\\ T &= T_{wall} &&\mbox{on outside wall}\\ \nabla T \cdot \vec{n} &= 0 &&\mbox{on inside (cylinder) wall} \end{align}
with temperature $T$ and coefficient $\kappa$ (nonphysical in this example). A convectiondiffusion equation is described inside the cylinder domain
\begin{align} \frac{\partial T}{\partial t} &= \kappa \Delta T  \alpha \nabla \cdot (\vec{b} T) & &\mbox{in inner cylinder}\\ T &= T_{wall} & &\mbox{on cylinder wall}\\ \nabla T \cdot \vec{n} &= 0 & &\mbox{else} \end{align}
with temperature $T$, coefficients $\kappa$, $\alpha$ and prescribed velocity profile $\vec{b}$, and $T_{wall}$ obtained from the heat equation.
To couple the solutions of both equations, a segregated solve with one way coupling approach is used. The heat equation of the outer box is solved from the timestep $T_{box}(t)$ to $T_{box}(t+dt)$. Then for the convectiondiffusion equation $T_{wall}$ is set to $T_{box}(t+dt)$ and the equation is solved for $T(t+dt)$ which results in a firstorder one way coupling.
This miniapp has only a parallel (multidomain.cpp) implementation. We recommend that new users start with the example codes before moving to the miniapps.